Trial vs. Settlement in South Carolina Personal Injury Cases: How the Decision Is Made
The vast majority of South Carolina personal injury cases settle before trial — but the decision to settle or litigate is never automatic. Understanding what drives that decision, and how an attorney evaluates it, helps Charleston injury plaintiffs make informed choices about their own cases.
More than 95% of personal injury cases in South Carolina resolve through settlement rather than trial. That statistic creates a perception that settlement is always the default outcome — but the reality is more nuanced. Settlement is optimal in some cases; trial is optimal in others; and the quality of legal representation often determines which path produces the better result for the injured person.
Why Most Cases Settle
Settlement provides certainty. Both parties avoid the cost, time, and uncertainty of trial. For a seriously injured plaintiff who needs compensation to pay medical bills, fund ongoing treatment, and replace lost income, the certainty of a settlement — even one below the theoretical trial value — can be preferable to waiting 18 to 36 months for a trial that might produce a higher verdict or might not. Defendants similarly prefer the certainty of a known cost over the risk of a larger verdict, particularly when punitive damages are in play.
Settlement also allows both parties to control the terms. A structured settlement that provides guaranteed income over many years may better serve a catastrophically injured plaintiff than a lump-sum verdict, which the plaintiff must then invest and manage. Non-monetary settlement terms — apologies, policy changes, early reporting of dangerous conditions — are also available in settlement and not available from a jury verdict.
When Trial Produces Better Results
Certain cases are better resolved at trial than at the negotiating table:
- When the defendant severely undervalues the claim. An insurer that offers $50,000 on a case worth $500,000 has made trial nearly inevitable. A credible trial team — with strong liability evidence, compelling medical proof, and an articulate plaintiff — can extract value at trial that no amount of negotiation would have produced.
- When the plaintiff's story is particularly compelling to a jury. Some cases — drunk driving catastrophes, deliberate safety violations, attacks on children — involve facts so compelling that a jury verdict is likely to exceed any reasonable settlement offer. These are the cases worth trying.
- When punitive damages are genuinely available. An insurer will typically not voluntarily pay a meaningful punitive damages amount in settlement; juries will. In cases where punitive damages are well-supported by the evidence, trial is frequently the only path to recovering them.
- When the defendant is using delay as a strategy. Some defendants — particularly institutional ones with deep pockets — use prolonged negotiation to wear down plaintiffs and erode their willingness to wait. Filing suit and pushing aggressively toward trial is sometimes the only tool that forces a serious settlement offer.
The Role of Tomlinson v. Mixon and South Carolina Trial Practice
The South Carolina Supreme Court's decisions on issues like jury instructions, the admissibility of prior incidents, and the proper scope of closing argument — addressed in cases like Tomlinson v. Mixon — directly affect the practical risks and benefits of trial. An attorney who is familiar with the current state of South Carolina trial law can evaluate the trial risk more accurately than one who litigates infrequently or primarily in other jurisdictions.
How the Decision Is Made
The decision to accept a settlement offer or proceed to trial belongs to the client — not the attorney. The attorney's role is to provide an honest assessment of: the liability picture, the damages evidence and its likely impact on a jury, the realistic trial value, the insurance coverage available, the defendant's trial counsel, the likely venue and its demographics, and the plaintiff's personal circumstances and risk tolerance. Armed with that analysis, the client makes an informed decision.
How Traywick Law Helps
Our office prepares every Charleston personal injury case as if it will go to trial, because that preparation is what produces fair settlements — and what produces verdicts when settlement is not possible. Visit the Traywick Legal Blog for more analysis.
Talk to a Charleston Attorney
If you have questions about how this issue affects your situation in Charleston, Mount Pleasant, or anywhere in the Lowcountry, contact Traywick Law Offices for a free consultation. Call (843) 343-5092.
Disclaimer: This article is provided for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every case is different — please consult an attorney about your specific situation.
Questions About Your Legal Rights?
David Traywick offers free consultations for personal injury and consumer law matters in Charleston, SC.