South Carolina Government Injury Claims: McCall and the Limits of Sovereign Immunity
McCall changed South Carolina sovereign immunity, but today's government injury cases require analysis under the Tort Claims Act—not an assumption that every public entity can be sued without limits.
People injured through alleged public-entity negligence often hear the word 'immunity' and assume that no claim is possible. The opposite assumption—that governments are treated exactly like private businesses—is also mistaken. The history explains why today's statutory rules matter.
Case Summary: McCall v. Batson
285 S.C. 243, 329 S.E.2d 741 (1985). Decision date: 1985-04-18. This is an analysis of a historical decision.
Jamie McCall, through a guardian, brought negligence and intentional-infliction claims against an individual and the Greenville County school district. The defendants sought dismissal on sovereign-immunity grounds. The trial court declined to dismiss, and the Supreme Court affirmed.
The 1985 Court abolished the broad common-law doctrine on a largely prospective basis, allowing time for legislative action and preserving protections for certain official discretionary acts. This was a foundational immunity ruling, not a decision awarding damages for a proven injury.
What the Court Held and Why
The Court rejected blanket common-law sovereign immunity as unfair and outdated. It nevertheless excluded legislative, judicial, and executive discretionary activities by officials acting in their official capacities from the abrogation.
The legislature subsequently adopted the South Carolina Tort Claims Act. Modern claims must be analyzed under that Act, including its exceptions, limits, proper-defendant rules, and timing requirements; the 1985 opinion is not a substitute for the statute.
Analysis: What the Decision Means for South Carolina Claims
For a Charleston government negligence claim, identify the entity, employee conduct, and statutory exception before evaluating recovery. Public ownership alone neither defeats the case nor guarantees that a waiver of immunity applies.
A discretionary-policy defense is different from an allegation of negligent implementation. The evidence should establish what decision was made, by whom, under what authority, and whether a specific operational duty was breached.
How the Rule Applies in a Charleston Case
Public-property injuries, government vehicle crashes, and claims involving public facilities require separate examination of duty and the Act. Private contractors involved in the same incident may face different rules.
Evidence That Can Decide the Claim
Preserve incident reports, policies, work orders, photographs, employee assignments, and communications. Public-records requests can aid investigation, but an outstanding request does not suspend a filing deadline.
Practical Takeaways
Seek early advice about the applicable Tort Claims Act provisions. Do not use a general three-year personal injury deadline or the language of an old immunity case without checking the rules for the actual defendant.
How Traywick Law Helps
Traywick Law Offices evaluates the controlling law, available evidence, and procedural requirements before recommending a course of action. Explore our related Charleston legal services and Court Legal Blog.
Read the Decision
McCall v. Batson — full opinion. Publication dates on this website are separate from the court's decision date.
Talk to a Charleston Attorney
For advice about your situation in Charleston, North Charleston, Mount Pleasant, Summerville, or the Lowcountry, contact Traywick Law Offices or call (843) 343-5092. A consultation can help identify the documents, deadlines, and legal issues that need attention.
This article is for general informational purposes only, not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on individual facts, applicable law, and procedural requirements. Historical decisions and agency guidance are not announcements of new September or October 2026 rulings or incidents.
Questions About Your Legal Rights?
David Traywick offers free consultations for personal injury and consumer law matters in Charleston, SC.